The Human Truth Foundation

Women as Possessions and Objects of Beauty in the Bible

By Vexen Crabtree 2014


#bible #buddhism #christianity #christianity_and_women #egypt #gender #hinduism #islam #judaism #misogyny #morals #new_age #paganism #politics #religion #religion_sex #satanism #sexuality #wicca #women

You shall not covet your neighbor's house. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

Exodus 20:17 and Deuteronomy 5:21

In the Bible, women have a special place - as objects of beauty and as possessions. In nearly every mention of any female in the Bible, she is not even given a name, and is described as "daughter of" or "wife of" a named man. She is first owned by her father until she is given to a new owner as his wife. Some sociologists have described the position of women in traditional religious communities to be no better than that of slaves1.

In Exodus 20:17 and Deuteronomy 5:21 men are warned against jealously "coveting" other men's possessions - which includes wives. These verses form part of what is commonly called the 10 Commandments. Yet strangely, women are themselves not told what they cannot covet. This is because women are not the controlling agent; they are the object, not the subject of these verses. In God's scheme in the Hebrew Scriptures that formed the Old Testament, God spoke to men, and men owned women. Therefore God rarely needed to speak to women.

Women in the Bible are owned objects, and, are defined by their owner. For example, take Leviticus 22:12-13: If a priest's daughter marries a non-believer, then, she is no longer welcome at religious events. It doesn't matter if she remains loyal to her beliefs - what matters are her husband's beliefs. If she is then widowed or divorced, and returns home, then, she is welcome again. What restrictions are there on a priest's son, if he marries a non-believing woman? None, of course. He's her owner, and he can do what he wants with her, and, he's the one that matters. Such are the unfortunate teachings of the Hebrew Scriptures.

These scriptures had a deleterious effect on Jewish culture and on Christian culture, and indirect long-term effects of this objectification continue today in much of the West (although in much milder form, now much of Europe has rejected religion). One critic writes that in Judaism "women are never referred to as persons, merely as property, and to see why, you must read the Bible"2. Some more examples of the objectification of women follow:

Stanton (1898) says that "the Hebrew mythology does not gild the season of courtship and marriage with much sentiment or romance. The transfer of a camel or a donkey from one owner to another, no doubt, was often marked with more consideration than that of a daughter. One loves a faithful animal long in our possession and manifests more grief in parting than did these Hebrew fathers in giving away their daughters"4. She notes that the words "beget" (as it is translated), which occurs frequently during description of family relations in the Bible, is always used of men. Men do the begetting, women are the ones who are begotten5..

Women As Beautiful Objects: To highlight their lesser worth, women's positive attributes in the Bible are normally to do with household duties and beauty6. For example the description of Job's daughters is that "Job had three daughtes. God adorned them with great beauty, no women being so fair as were the daughters of Job" (Job 42:13-15).

Marriage Restrictions on Outsiders: The Bible has many rules on marriage. In particular, its primary concern is about marriage to non-believers. Most laws are directed, in particular, at who men should take as their wives. The important issue is what religious beliefs sons will have. The implications are that women don't choose husbands, and, that it doesn't really matter what beliefs daughters have because they get told what's what by their fathers. For a full description of relevant verses from the Bible, see: "Marriage: Its Diversity and Character" by Vexen Crabtree (2004).

Hebrew Culture was famed for its male-centric structure. All of the histories written by the Hebrews were stories about men. About fathers and sons. Women are of course talked about, and, with rare exceptions, they are talked about as owned objects. All of this sounds very familiar. According to the Hebrew Scriptures, by an astounding coincidence, it happens that the eternal God of the Universe happens to have the exact same approach to women! This amazing stroke of luck is proof of only one thing - something long suspected by anthropologists everywhere: The Scriptures were the result of human (male) culture, written by human men with male interests at heart. It was invented by humans, not god, and it presents rules based on the biases of human culture, not based on divine law.

Traditional Religions and Women in General:

Most religious traditions have subjugated womankind7,8,9,1. The religious restrictions and taboos on womankind have ranged from the openly oppressive and inhumane, to subtle limitations. Women have been barred from leadership, prevented from religious learning and even from secular education, forbidden to hold power, denied fair inheritance and land ownership, denigrated, physically dominated, and sometimes even forbidden to speak10. All in accordance with holy texts, religious laws and guidelines. The Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam have been the worse; but also Hinduism and Buddhism have played roles in the long-term subjugation of women. In Elizabeth Cady Stanton's "The Woman's Bible" (1898)11 she bemoans that "all the religions on the face of the earth degrade her, and so long as woman accepts the position that they assign her, her emancipation is impossible"12. The much more neutral scholar of comparative religion, Moojan Momen, normally writes positively on nearly all aspects of religion, but when it comes to women, even he is forced into a multiple-page criticism of the historical role of religion1. Although some of this stems from ancient cultural sources before it happened to be codified in world religions13, organized religion has clung on to patriarchalism long after secular society has liberalized. Feminist groups have frequently been anti-religion simply because it is religion that has presented itself as the most consistent oppressor of womankind. The problems from traditional religions are not just historical: even today, religious organisations and powerful international religious lobbies hold back gender equality across the world14.

There is good news. The most readily accepted cure for both intolerance, religion and superstition is widely shown to be education. The position of women improves as education improves and as traditional religions lose their grip on society. Modern society has come to either ignore their traditional texts (as most Christians do) or to abandon religion (as many Westerners have done). Also many new religious movements and alternative religions such as Paganism, Wicca, the New Age and even Satanism practice full gender equality. As long as traditional religions continue to decline and secular society and new religions both grow, the situation of women continues to improve.

"Religion Versus Womankind" by Vexen Crabtree (2007)

The page menu for Religion Versus Womankind reads:

Current edition: 2014 Nov 02
Parent page: Hebrew Scriptures and Christian Holy Bibles Across Different Traditions

All #tags used on this page - click for more:

#bible #buddhism #christianity #christianity_and_women #egypt #gender #hinduism #islam #judaism #misogyny #morals #new_age #paganism #politics #religion #religion_sex #satanism #sexuality #wicca #women

Social Media

References: (What's this?)

Book Cover

Book Cover

The Bible (NIV). The NIV is the best translation for accuracy whilst maintaining readability. Multiple authors, a compendium of multiple previously published books. I prefer to take quotes from the NIV but where I quote the Bible en masse I must quote from the KJV because it is not copyrighted, whilst the NIV is. Book Review.

Armstrong, Karen
(1986) The Gospel According to Woman: Christianity's Creation of the Sex War in the West. Subtitled: "Christianity's Creation of the Sex War in the West". Published by Elm Tree Books/Hamish Hamilton Ltd, London, UK. A hardback book.

Clarke, Peter B.. Peter B. Clarke: Professor Emeritus of the History and Sociology of Religion, King's College, University of London, and currently Professor in the Faculty of Theology, University of Oxford, UK.
(2011) The Oxford Handbook of The Sociology of Religion. Originally published 2009. Current version published by Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. A paperback book.

Eliade, Mircea
(1987, Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Religion. Published by Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, USA. 16 huge volumes. Eliade is editor-in-chief. Entries are alphabetical, so, no page numbers are given in references, just article titles. A hardback book.

Hawthorne, Sîan. Hawthorn is Lecturer in Critical Theory and the Study of Religions and Chair of the Centre of Gender and Religions Research at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, UK.
(2011) Religion and Gender. This is chapter 7 of "The Oxford Handbook of The Sociology of Religion" by Peter B. Clarke (2011)1.

Momen, Moojan
(1999) The Phenomenon Of Religion: A Thematic Approach. Published by Oneworld Publications, Oxford, UK. A paperback book. Book Review.

Mumm, Susan
What it meant and what is means: feminism, religion and interpretation (2001), chapter 3 of "Religion and Social Transformations" by D. Herbert (2001)2.

NSS. The National Secular Society, London, UK.
Newsline. Weekly news letter. See: "Secularism" by Vexen Crabtree (2011).

Ruthven, Malise
(2007) Fundamentalism. Originally published 2005. Current version published by Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. New edition now published as part of the “Very Short Introduction” series.

Stanton, Elizabeth C.. (1815-1902)
(1898) The Woman's Bible. Amazon Kindle digital edition produced by Carrie Lorenz and John B. Hare. An e-book.


  1. Momen (1999). p439-440.^
  2. Stanton (1898). p81.^
  3. Stanton (1898). p137.^
  4. Stanton (1898). p224.^
  5. Stanton (1898). p138.^
  6. Stanton (1898). p270.^
  7. Hawthorne (2011). Author states that this is the opinion of scholars in general, regarding a variety of religions, and that the 'invisibility of women within religious traditions' is a real concern.^
  8. Armstrong (1986). P.X. She wrote that "Most religions have been male affairs and have kept women in a subordinate position".^
  9. Eliade (1987). Volume 15 entry "Women's Studies".^
  10. Ruthven (2007). Chapter 4 "Controlling Women" p71.^
  11. Stanton (1898) .^
  12. Stanton (1898). p15.^
  13. Mumm (2001) p120-121.^
  14. Newsline (2015 Mar 08) article "Religious lobbying threatens European Parliament vote on gender equality".^

©2019 Vexen Crabtree all rights reserved.
This site uses the HTF Disclaimer (as linked here)