The Human Truth Foundation

The Evil One in Buddhism
Māra, the Buddhist Satan

By Vexen Crabtree 2014


#buddhism #christianity #comparative_satanism #hinduism #religions #satan

Many religions contain an enemy of the system: a being that questions why things are the way they are, who challenges the supreme power(s), who accuses them of hypocrisy and who leads mankind away from cosmic ideals of subservience and acquiescence1. Satan often represents the world itself2. It has not appeared universally and many cultures lack any such centralized figure of evil3. In those places where it did arise there has not been a common path of development4. The root of the word Satan comes from ha-satan, a Hebrew word meaning "the accuser", "opposer" and "the adversary", or as a verb, "to accuse" and "to oppose". Anyone could be described as ha satan depending on their actions. The Septuagint Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures rendered the word as diabolus, from which we get the word "devil". In Christianity it is Satan, The Devil; in Islam it is Shaitan or Iblis and in Buddhism it is Māra, which means "bringer of death"5. All these opposing beings promote the materialism of this world, rather than the more spiritual route of abstaining from stuff in order to obtain the next world. In other words, the primary role of Satan, in its various guises in world religions, is the rejection of spiritual wishful-thinking, and the embrace of our present real-world life. It seems that from the point of view of philosophical naturalism, Satan turns out to be the "good" guy!

Many religions, typically Eastern religions such as Buddhism6 and Hinduism7, assert that everyone lives through a long succession of lives and that the material world and all conscious beings are separated from Nirvana. The cycle of rebirth (samsara) is a cycle of angst, pain and delusion, and only escape from the whole system can end suffering. To escape you need to attain enlightenment, and it is your desires, wants and carnal side that prevents this from happening, in Buddhism the being that represents the distractions of the real world is called Māra. The bad guys of the Buddhist the Pāli Canon are "dominated by the single figure of Māra" and long passages are devoted to this 'Evil One'8.

Book CoverReference to Māra in the Buddhist cannon, and its etymology, identify it with the very concept of death (and life, and consciousness, and all other Earthly things). "It is connexion with death, but particularly the overcoming of death, that Māra is often mentioned in the Canon. In this context death is always regarded as an evil, the unwelcome Antaka, the ender of an existence which is not ready to be ended"9. Māra represents darkness and blindness10 and all the sensory pleasures11. The full extent of Māra's power is utterly formidable to everyone except those on the verge of enlightenment, and is generally formidable even to those who have been following the eightfold-path for some time:

Put into Māra's mouth in the Kassaka Sutta:

'Mine, recluse, is the eye, mine are material shapes, mine is the field of visual consciousness. Where can you go, recluse, to escape from me? Precisely mine, recluse, are the ear, sounds, the field of auditory consciousness; the tongue, tastes, the field of gustatory consciousness; the body, touches, the field of tactile consciousness; precisely mine, recluse, is the mind, mine are the mental states, mine is the field of mental consciousness.'

All these claims of Māra are conceded by the Buddha: 'Precisely yours, Malign One, is all this. But where there is none of this, there is no coming in for you.' [...] What emerges from these definitions is a conception of the whole of samsāric existence as the realm over which Māra rules. [...] In terms of Buddhist cosmology this is a way of referring to the whole of life apart from [Nirvana]. [...]

Enumerated in detail in the Suttanipāta [Māra's forces] consist of passion, aversion, hunger and thirst, craving, sloth and torpor, fear, doubt, self-will, cant, and various forms of self-exaltation. Prominent among these, and specially closely connected with Māra is the first, passion (kāma, or rāga).

"Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil" by Trevor Ling (1997)12

An author who has studied Māra and the Christian Satan, Ernst Windich, came to the conclusion that despite some striking similarities, there are an equal number of striking differences, and that each idea really did develop independently13. It seems easy to see that where Māra and the Christian Satan mesh well is exactly in the way that us humans excel at creating abstract personalities from real-life problems (why is there evil, suffering and death in the world?), and where they mesh least well is in the theological and philosophical underpinning of the arch-enemy of mankind.

Current edition: 2014 Feb 05
Last Modified: 2014 Aug 13
Parent page: Buddhism

All #tags used on this page - click for more:

#buddhism #christianity #comparative_satanism #hinduism #religions #satan

Social Media

References: (What's this?)

Book Cover

Book Cover

Book Cover

Book Cover

Conze, Edward
(1959) Buddhist Scriptures. Published by Penguin Books. A paperback book.

Erricker, Clive
(1995) Buddhism. Part of the TeachYourself Books series. A paperback book.

Hinnells, John R.. Currently professor of theology at Liverpool Hope University.
(1997, Ed.) The Penguin Dictionary of Religions. Originally published 1984. Current version published by Penguin Books, London, UK. References to this book simply state the title of the entry used. A paperback book.

Ling, Trevor
(1997) Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil. Originally published 1962 by George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Current version published by Oneworld Publications, Oxford, UK. A paperback book.

Momen, Moojan
(1999) The Phenomenon Of Religion: A Thematic Approach. Published by Oneworld Publications, Oxford, UK. A paperback book. Book Review.


  1. Momen (1999). Chapter 9 "Suffering, Sacrifice and Salvation" p217.^
  2. Momen (1999). P129 for Christianity. Māra has the same role in Buddhism.^
  3. "Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil" by Trevor Ling (1997)14 quotes Sir Charles Eliot on p46: "No sect of Hinduism personifies the powers of evil in one figure corresponding to Satan, or the Ahriman of Persia'".^
  4. Ling (1997). P46.^
  5. Hinnells (1997) Mara.^
  6. Erricker (1995) .^
  7. Hinduism^
  8. "Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil" by Trevor Ling (1997)14 p43 says: "The demonology of the Pāli Canon is dominated by the single figure of Māra, the Evil One. Long passages are devoted to teaching about the Evil One, especially in the Majjhima, Anguttara and Samyutta-Nikāyas. [...] The principal sources for the Māra legend are: the Padhāna Sutta; the collection contained in the Māra-Samyutta and the Bhikkunī-Samyutta; the Māratajjaniya Sutta; the Mahāvagga of the Vinaya Pitaka [and others]". Although p70-76 Ling also notes that the concept of Māra is sometimes more popular amongst monasteries but less in the general populace.^
  9. Ling (1997). P56-57.^
  10. Ling (1997). P61.^
  11. Conze (1959). Chapter "Glossary of Technical Terms" p247.^
  12. Ling (1997). P58.^
  13. Ling (1997). P86. cites Māra und Buddha (Leipzig, 1895), p214.^
  14. Ling (1997) .^

©2018 Vexen Crabtree all rights reserved.
This site uses the HTF Disclaimer (as linked here)